<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: At the Intersection of Marketing and Metrics, the traffic lights don&#8217;t work.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledge.digitalrealtytrust.com/2009/07/at-the-intersection-of-marketing-and-metrics-the-traffic-lights-dont-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledge.digitalrealtytrust.com/2009/07/at-the-intersection-of-marketing-and-metrics-the-traffic-lights-dont-work/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:33:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Oestreich</title>
		<link>http://knowledge.digitalrealtytrust.com/2009/07/at-the-intersection-of-marketing-and-metrics-the-traffic-lights-dont-work/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Oestreich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledge.digitalrealtytrust.com/2009/07/at-the-intersection-of-marketing-and-metrics-the-traffic-lights-dont-work/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>IMHO, your statement &quot;The larger industry would be better served by focusing more on application architecture, machine utilization, virtualization, and like technologies before pushing closer to 1.0.&quot; hits the nail on the head.

While PUE is a fantastic first-step for DC OPs to begin to measure efficiency, it&#039;s only a start.... since you can have a fantastic PUE and yet very poor machine utilization.

I&#039;d love to see the industry decide on a dual metric(s) - PUE, which essentially meters infrastructure efficiency, and another metric that measures compute efficiency. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, your statement &#8220;The larger industry would be better served by focusing more on application architecture, machine utilization, virtualization, and like technologies before pushing closer to 1.0.&#8221; hits the nail on the head.</p>
<p>While PUE is a fantastic first-step for DC OPs to begin to measure efficiency, it&#8217;s only a start&#8230;. since you can have a fantastic PUE and yet very poor machine utilization.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see the industry decide on a dual metric(s) &#8211; PUE, which essentially meters infrastructure efficiency, and another metric that measures compute efficiency. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
