<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Myth-of-the-Month: PUE, Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledge.digitalrealtytrust.com/2009/12/myth-of-the-month-pue-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledge.digitalrealtytrust.com/2009/12/myth-of-the-month-pue-part-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:33:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ghaley</title>
		<link>http://knowledge.digitalrealtytrust.com/2009/12/myth-of-the-month-pue-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>ghaley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledge.digitalrealtytrust.com/?p=1135#comment-94</guid>
		<description>I look forward to the next installment of this myth. I have been preaching that PUE is an ongoing process rather than a report card on progress. Data centers are dynamic environments, with adds, changes and deletes constantly going on. Regular readings need to be taken to develop a trend chart to demonstrate the inpact of changes that have been made over time. 

Not all energy saving changes will result in a better PUE calculation. The implementation of virtual servers may reduce the overall energy consummed by the IT load, but may not be enough of a BTU saving to reflect reduced cooling expenses. You net result is a reduced energy expense (less IT load) but a higher PUE as the infrastructure expense remains constant.


I always stress that one should not fall in love with the numbers, rather the overall results of the changes. Use the calculations as a tool to monitor your trend and have the knowledge of what impact each change has made to the overall operation.

Keep up the good work.

Gregg Haley

Principal
Gregg Haley &amp; Associates</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look forward to the next installment of this myth. I have been preaching that PUE is an ongoing process rather than a report card on progress. Data centers are dynamic environments, with adds, changes and deletes constantly going on. Regular readings need to be taken to develop a trend chart to demonstrate the inpact of changes that have been made over time. </p>
<p>Not all energy saving changes will result in a better PUE calculation. The implementation of virtual servers may reduce the overall energy consummed by the IT load, but may not be enough of a BTU saving to reflect reduced cooling expenses. You net result is a reduced energy expense (less IT load) but a higher PUE as the infrastructure expense remains constant.</p>
<p>I always stress that one should not fall in love with the numbers, rather the overall results of the changes. Use the calculations as a tool to monitor your trend and have the knowledge of what impact each change has made to the overall operation.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
<p>Gregg Haley</p>
<p>Principal<br />
Gregg Haley &amp; Associates</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
